Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of regression analyses when predicting epigenetic ageing measures by sleep deprivation

From: Sleep disturbances, shift work, and epigenetic ageing in working-age adults: findings from the Young Finns study

  

Model 1

(n = 1616)

  

Model 2

(n = 1451)

  

Model 3

(n = 1439)

 

β

95% CI

p

β

95% CI

p

β

95% CI

p

AgeDevPheno

0.14

− 0.38, 0.66

0.588

0.09

− 0.44, 0.63

0.734

0.24

− 0.30, 0.78

0.384

AgeDevGrim

− 0.15

− 0.44, 0.13

0.287

− 0.14

− 0.43, 0.15

0.331

− 0.07

− 0.36, 0.22

0.638

AgeDevHannum

0.02

− 0.38, 0.42

0.923

− 0.05

− 0.47, 0.38

0.832

0.04

− 0.39, 0.46

0.867

AgeDevHorvath

0.45

0.05, 0.85

0.028*

0.37

− 0.06, 0.80

0.090

0.39

− 0.04, 0.81

0.074

DunedinPACE

0.00

− 0.01, 0.01

0.552

0.01

0.00, 0.02

0.082

0.01

0.00, 0.02

0.206

  1. Statistically significant associations (p < 0.05, unadjusted) are bolded, and those that remained significant after FDR correction are marked with an asterisk. Model 1 was adjusted for sex, daily smoking status, and array type. Model 2 was adjusted for Model 1 covariates and health factors. Model 3 was adjusted with Model 1 covariates and socioeconomic factors
Back to article page

Clinical Epigenetics

ISSN: 1868-7083

Contact us