Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of regression analyses when predicting epigenetic ageing measures by insomnia symptoms

From: Sleep disturbances, shift work, and epigenetic ageing in working-age adults: findings from the Young Finns study

  

Model 1

(n = 1617)

  

Model 2

(n = 1451)

  

Model 3

(n = 1440)

 

β

95% CI

p

β

95% CI

p

β

95% CI

p

AgeDevPheno

0.15

− 0.14, 0.44

0.307

0.02

− 0.28, 0.33

0.888

0.14

− 0.17, 0.45

0.379

AgeDevGrim

0.07

− 0.09, 0.23

0.365

− 0.07

− 0.24, 0.09

0.380

0.00

− 0.16, 0.17

0.959

AgeDevHannum

− 0.05

− 0.28, 0.17

0.635

− 0.13

− 0.37, 0.11

0.299

− 0.07

− 0.31, 0.17

0.559

AgeDevHorvath

0.05

− 0.17, 0.28

0.650

− 0.07

− 0.31, 0.18

0.594

− 0.02

− 0.26, 0.22

0.867

DunedinPACE

0.01

0.00, 0.01

0.007*

0.00

0.00, 0.01

0.199

0.00

0.00, 0.01

0.112

  1. Statistically significant associations (p < 0.05, unadjusted) are bolded, and those that remained significant after FDR correction are marked with an asterisk. Model 1 was adjusted for sex, daily smoking status, and array type. Model 2 was adjusted for Model 1 covariates and health factors. Model 3 was adjusted with Model 1 covariates and socioeconomic factors
Back to article page

Clinical Epigenetics

ISSN: 1868-7083

Contact us