Skip to main content

Table 2 Methylation age and its acceleration between good and poor sleepers

From: The association between sleep quality and accelerated epigenetic aging with metabolic syndrome in Korean adults

EA or EAA

Total (N = 692)

Good sleepers (N = 441)

Poor sleepers (N = 251)

p-value

HorvathAge

46.43 (5.33)

46.30 (5.28)

46.60 (5.41)

0.25

HannumAge

53.28 (5.81)

53.2 (5.75)

53.51 (5.92)

0.12

PhenoAge

39.14 (6.33)

39.05 (6.29)

39.30 (6.41)

0.42

GrimAge

64.14 (7.07)

64.08 (6.96)

64.26 (7.26)

0.23

HorvathAgeAccel

0.80 (3.37)

0.82 (3.39)

0.76 (3.33)

0.93

HannumAgeAccel

0.82 (3.01)

0.79 (2.97)

0.88 (3.09)

0.31

PhenoAgeAccel

1.10 (4.23)

1.23 (4.23)

0.88 (4.22)

0.23

GrimAgeAccel

0.42 (3.94)

0.65 (3.88)

0.03 (4.03)

0.02

DunedinPACE

1.02 (0.08)

1.02 (0.08)

1.02 (0.09)

0.41

  1. AgeAccel epigenetic age acceleration; EA epigenetic age; EAA epigenetic age accelerator. Data were shown as mean (standard deviation). p-value was calculated using t test or Mann–Whitney U-test